What surprises me is that the Dutch authorities continue to be surprised by the increase.
Let’s see:
Take the social taboo of euthanasia, allow it to happen undercover, then tut-tut that instead of happening behind closed doors, it should be regulated and ‘transparent.” This doltish idea was meant to ensure that undercover euthanasia was stopped and only happened under very rare and highly controlled circumstances.
It hasn’t turned out that way, as some of us predicted years ago.
Here’s the slippery slope:
First, euthanasia was meant for only those adults who were terminally ill and in unbearable and uncontrollable physical pain.
Then, euthanasia was allowed for those with unbearable physical pain, even if it could be controlled, and even f they were not terminally ill.
Then euthanasia was allowed for those who were not only not terminally ill, but for people in no physical pain whatsoever – psychological pain, controllable or not, was enough.
Then the age limit was extended to adolescents.
So, from DutchNews.nl:
The number of reported deaths by euthanasia rose 13% last year to 2,636, following an increase of 10% in 2008, the NRC reports, quoting figures due to be published at the beginning of July.
The 2008 increase led the health ministry to set up an investigation into the increase. That investigation is due to start this month.
This is not the whole macabre picture, either: These stats reflect ONLY patients who requested to be killed.
It does not include hundreds, and perhaps thousands, who are euthanized even though they never requested it.
It does not include the hundreds of newborns with disabilities that are murdered under the so-called Groningen Protocol.
It does not include legalized assisted suicides.
Here’s the truth: Euthanasia is now increasingly accepted as just another medical procedure. The social constraints have collapsed.
Need any more proof?
A recent survey in the Netherlands showed that there was strong public sentiment for making euthanasia available for anyone over 70 even if the only reason to die was because they were “tired” of living.
One final point: No, we’re not at the bottom of the slippery slope. It will get worse.
2 comments:
This blog post will explain the difference between PoC, prototype, and MVP and how to test the assumptions with the minimum set of features. We'll go through each approach in detail and show how the process looks like in practice. https://cxdojo.com/poc-prototype-or-mvp-how-to-achieve-product-market-fit
Thank you ffor writing this
Post a Comment